Then the new Secretary used "active conservation" to justify his active redevelopment and development, emphasizing that "biodiversity" does not emphasize the area of conservation. The real problem is, I haven't seen you "actively conserve" in the conservation area for many years, and you will definitely not take back the privately held wetlands for conservation.
If you are at home, as job email list long as you actively conserve one wetland, the other wetland will be destroyed. Li development can be brought out. In fact, the wetland environment is not something you can compensate for if you make up for the east and make up for the west. So how many active conservation? The reporter asked Qu in the policy address that the previous government had proposed to make 700 hectares of wetlands (including Nam Sang Wai) as three wetland parks. "Conservation", do you think Mi will wait until she takes office? In fact, wetland conservation all over the world focuses on a certain range of protection as the basic standard.
It focuses on how many biological systems are involved, and the buffer zone is used to preserve various factors such as hydrology, food, pollution and isolation of wetlands. So we have the wetland conservation area/buffer boundary of today. However, depending on your new conservation concept, it is a dynamic DIY. It is better to quit the Ramsar International Convention on Wetlands, which is just a so-called "enclosure-style conservation" in your mouth. Looking at it, Xie Zhanhuan's remarks seem to be from the Development Bureau, Land Development Association, Heung Yee Kuk, and more from the Environment and Ecology Bureau. In fact, did he go to the wrong place?